Yet another OBSERVATION vs. EVALUATION issue

Stef Verlinden stef at vivici.nl
Tue Aug 21 15:35:20 EDT 2012


Op 21 aug. 2012, om 21:04 heeft Jussara macedo het volgende geschreven:

> Hello,
> that´s what CKM and the openEHR community are for!
> Regards

Exactly. At least that should be the purpose. Why else would we bother and put time in this openEHR effort.

Cheers,

Stef

> Jussara Rötzsch
> Md, MSc
> Director, OpenEHR Foundation
> Owner, Giant Global Graph ehealth Solutions
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Stefan Sauermann <sauermann at technikum-wien.at> wrote:
> Hello!
> If you want to be interoperable to "the rest of the world", you will have to sit together with all of them, agree on the information you want to share in which situation, on how it is packed for communication and write this up in an agreement.
> 
> Before that day, there will be no safe interoperability without human brains checking each exchange thoroughly, asking back in case of doubt.
> 
> There will only be interoperability with those who agreed beforehand.
> 
> 
> Hope this helps, greetings from Vienna,
> Stefan
> 
> 
> -- 
> Stefan Sauermann
> 
> 
> 
> Gerard Freriks <gfrer at luna.nl> schrieb:
> But what to do with the rest of the world that continues to use the term diagnosis meaning something else?
> 
> Gerard Freriks
> +31 620347088
> gfrer at luna.nl
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 20 Aug 2012, at 16:30, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> 
>>> and panic attacks/hyper ventilation. These were my inferences about the
>>> process inside the patient system.
>>>> Only one was true and had to found out via trial and error diagnostics
>>> and trial treatments. I fear that the best we can do in most circumstances
>>> (as GP) is to code 'Reasons for ..' and do not use the word diagnosis too
>>> often.
>>> 
>>> Isn't that what we call 'differential diagnosis'?
>>> 
>>> Anyhow. I agree that these DD or reasons for should be seperated and
>>> clearly distinctable from the 'final' diangosis, preferably based on facts and
>>> deduction.
>> 
>> "final" diagnoses mainly exist with the field of pathology/the coroners
>> office.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120821/80043e4e/attachment.html>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list