lessons from Intermountain Health, and starting work on openEHR 2.x
thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
Wed Oct 3 18:02:31 EDT 2012
On 13/09/2012 10:15, David Moner wrote:
> 2012/9/13 Erik Sundvall <erik.sundvall at liu.se
> <mailto:erik.sundvall at liu.se>>
> It would be great if e.g most of the future ISO 13606 version
> could be a true subset of openEHR instead of the current confusing
> This is something I discussed with Thomas some time ago, it would be
> one of the best harmonisation solutions, but probably with a slightly
> different interpretation. Since 13606 has more generic classes (eg.
> the generic ENTRY can represent all of OBSERVATION, EVALUATION,
> INSTRUCTION, ACTION), instead of 13606 being a subset of openEHR I
> think that openEHR should be a specialized model of 13606. Obviously
> this would require a deep analysis and changes of the models, but that
> could be the idea.
I don't care about the linguistics of subset / specialisation etc, I
just care about getting one model....
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openEHR-clinical