lessons from Intermountain Health, and starting work on openEHR 2.x

Thomas Beale thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
Wed Oct 3 18:02:31 EDT 2012

On 13/09/2012 10:15, David Moner wrote:
> Hi,
> 2012/9/13 Erik Sundvall <erik.sundvall at liu.se 
> <mailto:erik.sundvall at liu.se>>
>     It would be great if e.g most of the future ISO 13606 version
>     could be a true subset of openEHR instead of the current confusing
>     situation. 
> This is something I discussed with Thomas some time ago, it would be 
> one of the best harmonisation solutions, but probably with a slightly 
> different interpretation. Since 13606 has more generic classes (eg. 
> the generic ENTRY can represent all of OBSERVATION, EVALUATION, 
> INSTRUCTION, ACTION), instead of 13606 being a subset of openEHR I 
> think that openEHR should be a specialized model of 13606. Obviously 
> this would require a deep analysis and changes of the models, but that 
> could be the idea.

I don't care about the linguistics of subset / specialisation etc, I 
just care about getting one model....

- thomas

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20121003/98d1dd21/attachment.html>

More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list