Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946

jussara.macedo jussara.macedo at gmail.com
Fri Mar 22 04:58:37 EDT 2013


I don't, but   Lincoln  Moura, the. New  President is a frien and i will ask him to introduce me.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 21, 2013, at 9:49 PM, "Evelyn Hovenga" <ehovenga at gmail.com> wrote:

> Does anyone know either of these Co-Chairs personally ? 
> Dominik Aronsky (Switzerland, Co-­Chair) 
> Tze­‐Yun Leong (Singapore, Co-­Chair)
>  
> If yes than please have a friendly discussion to see if this decision can be reversed.
>  
> Evelyn
>  
> <image001.jpg>
> Prof Evelyn J.S.Hovenga, CEO, Director & Trainer
> eHealth Education Pty Ltd, RTO 32279
> (trading as RSC Training and eHE Training)
> 
> :  PO Box 9783,  Frenchville Qld 4701
> *  e.hovenga at ehe.edu.au
> È  0408309839
> '  1300 285 512
> 8  www.ehe.edu.au 
> 8  www.ehetraining.com.au
>  
> .
>  
> From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Koray Atalag
> Sent: Friday, 22 March 2013 11:09 AM
> To: For openEHR clinical discussions
> Subject: RE: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946
>  
> I suggest contacting the chair of SPC in person again and have a friendly discussion by giving all specifics. I’ve had positive results in past.
> If not let’s protest it by not attending and they’ll never dare to do that again! That’s just one good example of how peer review processes can be flawed. I don’t think there is any bad intentions but just natural limitations of time and human resource. These should all be crowd-sourced.
>  
> Cheers,
>  
> -koray
>  
> From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Jussara
> Sent: Sunday, 17 March 2013 8:00 p.m.
> To: For openEHR clinical discussions
> Cc: For openEHR clinical discussions
> Subject: Re: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946
>  
> I was about to suggest that,  but as one of the authors I think a letter from me could be taken  by them as a defense of personal intererests, could we do it collectively, like an Avaaz petition? if  we gather some signatures  and send is as a group it could be effective, what do you think?
>  
> 
> Enviado via iPad
> 
> Em Mar 17, 2013, às 1:35 AM, "Heather Leslie" <heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com> escreveua:
> 
> Following on from Silje, Jussara and John’s recent emails, I wonder if members of the community were to contact the scientific committee and request that the decision not to run the workshop be reconsidered…
>  
> Would that influence their decision?
>  
> Anyone interested? Or am I totally mad? J
>  
> Cheers
>  
> Heather
>  
> P.S. spc at medinfo2013.dk J
>  
> From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of John Hughes
> Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 11:21 PM
> To: 'For openEHR clinical discussions'
> Subject: RE: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946
>  
> The ascendance of clinical modeling on the international informatics agenda should be supported. The ground work done by the openEHR Foundation has shown prescient leadership. I will attend any tutorial or presentation related to this at MedInfo 2013. The last session at the  Cape Town MedInfo helped spawn a national initiative to  achieve clinical information and process standards for the eMR domain in Canada.
>  
> Best to all
> Willing to help
>  
> jh
>  
> John B. Hughes M.D., C.M.
> Assistant Professor
> McGill University
> Faculty of Medicine
>  
> From: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of Jussara macedo
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2013 8:00 AM
> To: For openEHR clinical discussions
> Subject: Re: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946
>  
> Last year I attended a Congress in Argentina which pogram was organized according the preferences of the potential attendees gathered months before through a social network. Verey web 2.0, very openEHR. e also had difficulties in approving panels and workshop related to this theme before in our national congresses, we´re never in the main room, but this year our workshop was by far the most attended. Lots of young  clinicians, Y generation, many of them working on mhealth  startups, ipad EHRs,clinical decision support systems, health social networks and other health 2.0 initiatives, all of them knowing exactly the value of the bloody data. Times are a changing, and fast.  Scientific committees os Informatics Congresses also have to enter the 2.0 era and interact more timely with the audience. I´m sure our workshop would be a blast and would attract a new audience to the congress, which is this new generation. They are not informaticians, they are naturals....
> Jussara Rötzsch
> Owner, Giant Global Graph ehealth Solutions
> 
>  
> 
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 8:40 AM, Bakke, Silje Ljosland <silje.ljosland.bakke at helse-bergen.no> wrote:
> I hope you succeed! I was planning on going to Medinfo if this workshop was accepted. J
>  
> Kind regards,
> Silje Ljosland Bakke
> E-health adviser
> 40203298
> Haukeland University Hospital
> www.helse-bergen.no
> 
>  
> Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] På vegne av Ian McNicoll
> Sendt: 14. mars 2013 11:42
> Til: For openEHR clinical discussions
> Emne: Re: FW: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946
>  
> Thanks Heather,
>  
> Worth a try :-)
>  
> Ian
>  
> 
> On 14 March 2013 03:17, Heather Leslie <heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
> Let’s see if they’ll reconsider. Worth a try!
>  
> H
>  
> From: Heather Leslie [mailto:heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 2:17 PM
> To: 'spc at medinfo2013.dk'
> Subject: RE: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946
>  
> Dear Sir or Madam,
>  
> Given that our submission was rejected on the grounds that it was more suited for a different format and not for lack of merit, is it possible for this to be reconsidered as a tutorial?
>  
> This approach that we wish to share is gaining significant international traction and in all other conferences attracts significant interest. In fact, at MIE in Sweden our workshop on openEHR was the only one to achieve sufficient registrants to actually run.
>  
> I would respectfully ask your committee to reconsider our proposal, specifically because of the reviewers comments re needing a different format, not that the proposal was not of use or interest. I also note the reviewers specifically point out the strengths of the proposal coming from a panel of very experienced implementers and a clear educational purpose.
>  
> Many thanks for your reconsideration,
>  
> Regards
>  
> Heather Leslie
>  
> Dr Heather Leslie
> MBBS FRACGP FACHI
> Director of Clinical Modelling
> Ocean Informatics
> Phone (Aust) +61 (0)418 966 670
> Skype - heatherleslie
> Twitter - @omowizard
>  
> From: Medinfo2013 [mailto:mailrobot at online-registry.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, 14 March 2013 3:05 AM
> To: heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com
> Subject: Medinfo 2013 - Scientific Program Committee Decision, Id: 946
>  
> Medinfo 2013
> 
>  
> MEDINFO 2013 - Decision on Submission ID MEDINFO-946
> 
> 12th March 2013
> 
>  
> Dear Dr. Heather Leslie,
> 
> Thank you for submitting your contribution entitled The international impact of openEHR clinical content models (Id=946) to MEDINFO 2013, the 14th World Congress on Medical and Health Informatics to be held from August 20-23 2013 at the Bella Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
> 
> Medinfo 2013 received a very large number of submissions, with more than 500 papers and more than 200 posters. All submitted papers were reviewed by a minimum of two reviewers and members of the Scientific Program Committee (SPC). All submitted posters, workshops, panels, and scientific demonstrations were reviewed by members of the SPC. Given the constraints of the limited meeting length and space, and the high quality of the submissions, the SPC was forced to make some difficult decisions this year.
> 
> Unfortunately, your submission was not accepted for the conference program. We appreciated your submission; comments from the reviewers are listed below and we hope that they are informative and helpful.
> 
> MEDINFO 2013 Decision: Not Accepted
> 
> We hope that you can still join the international biomedical informatics community at MEDINFO in Copenhagen. The early bird deadline is April 15, 2013. You can register and get additional information about the conference program, tutorial, on-site program, etc. at: www.medinfo2013.dk
> 
> 
> Warm Regards
> 
> Dominik Aronsky & Tze-Yun Leong, SPC Co-chairs
> 
> 
> Reviewers' Comments
> 
> This proposal is more suitable for a tutorial. The authors do not clearly describe audience engagement strategies.THe strengths come from a panel of experimented implementers of openEHR archetypes and a clear educational purpose, but it lacks methodology to encourage attendees to interact with the presenters.
> 
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> office +44 (0)1536 414 994
> fax +44 (0)1536 516317
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> skype ianmcnicoll
> ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
> 
> Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
> Director openEHR Foundation  www.openehr.org/knowledge
> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
> SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland
> BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130322/bc1207fd/attachment.html>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list