Clinical Modeling - A critical analysis

Diego Boscá yampeku at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 06:35:58 EDT 2015


Count us in ;)

2015-03-11 11:08 GMT+01:00 Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>:
>
> I actually wrote to Jan Talmon about this when I was first aware of it (30
> Oct 2013) and gave him my opinion of the quality of the science in this
> paper (it wasn't very positive;-). His view was that I / we / someone should
> write a letter to the editor of IJMI in which the errors / shortcomings are
> discussed. I did not do this for lack of time, but I think it would make
> sense to still do this and/or write a much better paper on the topic, which
> could cover actual evidence and science being done in openEHR projects,
> Intermountain environment, and UPV projects as well.
>
> thoughts?
>
> - thomas
>
> On 01/03/2015 20:38, Diego Boscá wrote:
>>
>> I agree, a response paper seems the most logical approach.
>>
>> 2015-03-01 21:31 GMT+01:00 Koray Atalag <k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz>:
>>>
>>> I’m completely disappointed, but not surprised, that this paper was
>>> accepted
>>> as a scientific paper in the first place with such bold arguments.
>>>
>>> We have all seen him advocating on openEHR during quite a few EU FP6
>>> project
>>> proposals – I certainly attended a few workshops together. At some point
>>> he
>>> must have been alienated or something?? At any rate I think it is our
>>> responsibility to publish a formal rebuttal and challenge this paper.
>>> That’s
>>> what science is about, isn’t it?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org




More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list