How to fix CKM biggest issue

Sebastian Garde sebastian.garde at oceaninformatics.com
Wed Mar 11 07:27:25 EDT 2015


Hi Gustavo,

What we will have soon with the next release of CKM is the ability for 
any user to propose new archetypes.
We call them Archetype Proposals - this is essentially the Sandbox you 
are suggesting, but it is not yet an incubator - more like an Inbox.

Archetype Proposals will then be assigned to appropriate projects or 
incubators by Clinical Knowledge Admins (CKAs).
Although CKAs are indeed a small number of people, this should not be a 
bottle-neck because this is a small task only (akin to sorting through 
the inbox)

 From there on, there can be many editors for the separate 
projects/incubators in addition who would oversee the further 
development/review and publishing of the proposed archetypes.

If you want to check it out, you can go to our Test CKM at 
http://ckm-test.oceaninformatics.com
Create an account if you don't have one and go to Archetypes/Propose New 
Archetype to submit a new archetype.
(Just note that this is a test/development server and may be unstable, 
unavailable, and any data on it may be changed or deleted at any time.)

Having said that, as you say, I think more editors to share the burden 
in the individual projects would be great, of course.

Regards
Sebastian

On 11.03.2015 10:54, Gustavo Bacelar wrote:
> Dear all,
> I would like to suggest some very important changes for governance 
> model of CKM. As you all know, CKM is a keystone to openEHR, but its 
> actual governance model is outdated and holds the development and 
> inclusion of new archetypes.
>
> As long as I know there are only 2 main editors that can import any 
> type of archetypes to CKM. I'm an editor too, but I can only import to 
> Ophthalmology Project and some other Incubators. The inclusion of new 
> archetypes can not depend on only 2-3 people. It is a huge constraint 
> to the development of openEHR, we must have more main editors.
>
> What I propose is to follow a governance model similar to Wikipedia. 
> It should be possible to anyone to submit archetypes, but these would 
> be in a sandbox, which already exists: the Incubators. These would 
> stimulate other participants of CKM to develop new archetypes and to 
> improve them much faster. When an archetype is sufficiently mature, an 
> editor would include it to public use.
>
> Kind regards
> -- 
> Gustavo Bacelar
> MD + MBA + MSc Med Informatics
> Skype: gustavobacela
> ​r
> LinkedIn: pt.linkedin.com/in/gbacelar <http://pt.linkedin.com/in/gbacelar>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

-- 
*Dr. Sebastian Garde*
/Dr. sc. hum., Dipl.-Inform. Med, FACHI/
Ocean Informatics

Skype: gardeseb


---
Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren geprüft.
http://www.avast.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20150311/3afe0c6a/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list