Clinical Modeling - A critical analysis

Ian McNicoll ian at freshehr.com
Wed Mar 11 08:53:27 EDT 2015


Hi all,

It is great to hear enthusiasm for this effort. Anyone prepared to take a
(? joint) lead. It would be good to have some clear progress before the
next round of conference deadlines.

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: ian at freshehr.com
twitter: @ianmcnicoll

Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics
Director, openEHR Foundation
Director, HANDIHealth CIC
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL

On 11 March 2015 at 12:10, Mate Beštek <mate.bestek at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> such a paper would also be interesting to me and our MoH and NIPH...
> I have to prepare something similar also for the EU JA Parent project so I
> would be happy to cooperate on this article...
>
>
> Regards
>
> Mate
>
> On 11 March 2015 at 11:55, Mikael Nyström <mikael.nystrom at liu.se> wrote:
>
>> I might also be interested.
>>
>>         Regards
>>         Mikael
>>
>>
>> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
>> Från: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org]
>> För Diego Boscá
>> Skickat: den 11 mars 2015 11:36
>> Till: For openEHR clinical discussions
>> Ämne: Re: Clinical Modeling - A critical analysis
>>
>> Count us in ;)
>>
>> 2015-03-11 11:08 GMT+01:00 Thomas Beale <
>> thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>:
>> >
>> > I actually wrote to Jan Talmon about this when I was first aware of it
>> > (30 Oct 2013) and gave him my opinion of the quality of the science in
>> > this paper (it wasn't very positive;-). His view was that I / we /
>> > someone should write a letter to the editor of IJMI in which the
>> > errors / shortcomings are discussed. I did not do this for lack of
>> > time, but I think it would make sense to still do this and/or write a
>> > much better paper on the topic, which could cover actual evidence and
>> > science being done in openEHR projects, Intermountain environment, and
>> UPV projects as well.
>> >
>> > thoughts?
>> >
>> > - thomas
>> >
>> > On 01/03/2015 20:38, Diego Boscá wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I agree, a response paper seems the most logical approach.
>> >>
>> >> 2015-03-01 21:31 GMT+01:00 Koray Atalag <k.atalag at auckland.ac.nz>:
>> >>>
>> >>> I’m completely disappointed, but not surprised, that this paper was
>> >>> accepted as a scientific paper in the first place with such bold
>> >>> arguments.
>> >>>
>> >>> We have all seen him advocating on openEHR during quite a few EU FP6
>> >>> project proposals – I certainly attended a few workshops together.
>> >>> At some point he must have been alienated or something?? At any rate
>> >>> I think it is our responsibility to publish a formal rebuttal and
>> >>> challenge this paper.
>> >>> That’s
>> >>> what science is about, isn’t it?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> > openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>> > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.opene
>> > hr.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20150311/3ea6b99e/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list