Braden (Q) Scale

Birger Haarbrandt birger.haarbrandt at plri.de
Mon Mar 16 04:17:19 EDT 2015


No worries! :)

Am 15.03.2015 um 22:39 schrieb sam.heard at openehrfoundation.org:
> Just to apologise to Birger that I was typing on my phone without my 
> glasses in the email reply - hence I called you Burger and me Aam. I 
> thought it was lucky that the letter ‘h’ was not to the left of the 
> ‘s’! 😊 I am worried that Erik Sundvall might think my parochial 
> spelling pervasive.
> Cheers, Sam
>
>
> *From:* Birger Haarbrandt <mailto:birger.haarbrandt at plri.de>
> *Sent:* ‎Monday‎, ‎16‎ ‎March‎ ‎2015 ‎3‎:‎36‎ ‎AM
> *To:* For openEHR clinical discussions 
> <mailto:openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
> *Cc:* For openEHR clinical discussions 
> <mailto:openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
>
> Sounds like a plan, I'll be happy to use it for data integration and 
> will provide feedback! By the way, I was surprised to find the Q scale 
> in our icu system serving the non-pediatric icu wards. Therefore, it 
> would be interesting to learn if its usage in adult patients is common 
> or something that needs some investigations (= I will need to talk to 
> some nurses about the reasons).
>
> Thank you very much!
>
> Best,
>
> Birger
>
> Von meinem iPad gesendet
>
> Am 14.03.2015 um 11:05 schrieb Ian McNicoll <ian at freshehr.com 
> <mailto:ian at freshehr.com>>:
>
>     Thanks Sam,
>
>     I'm happy to work with Birger to get this sorted out. I am pretty
>     sure this was simply a case of me inadvertently overwriting some
>     descriptions in the Braden Q archetype with those from the adult
>     version.
>
>     @Birger - I will try to put up the new version into CKM in the
>     next couple of days. Can you adopt the archetype and let me know
>     if it seems correct to you?
>
>     Ian
>
>
>
>     Dr Ian McNicoll
>     mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
>     office +44 (0)1536 414994
>     skype: ianmcnicoll
>     email: ian at freshehr.com <mailto:ian at freshehr.com>
>     twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>
>     Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics
>     Director, openEHR Foundation
>     Director, HANDIHealth CIC
>     Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>
>     On 14 March 2015 at 09:27, Sam Heard
>     <sam.heard at openehrfoundation.org
>     <mailto:sam.heard at openehrfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
>         Burger
>         Would you own this one?
>         Cheers Aam
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>         From: Birger Haarbrandt <mailto:birger.haarbrandt at plri.de>
>         Sent: ‎12/‎03/‎2015 9:30 PM
>         To: For openEHR clinical discussions
>         <mailto:openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
>         Subject: Re: Braden (Q) Scale
>
>         Hi Ian,
>
>         thank you very much! :)
>
>         Best,
>
>         Birger
>
>         Am 12.03.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Ian McNicoll:
>
>             Hi Birger,
>
>             I suspect I am responsible for this. I will check out what
>             may have gone wrong :(
>
>             Ian
>
>             Dr Ian McNicoll
>             mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
>             <tel:%2B44%20%280%29775%20209%207859>
>             office +44 (0)1536 414994 <tel:%2B44%20%280%291536%20414994>
>             skype: ianmcnicoll
>             email: ian at freshehr.com <mailto:ian at freshehr.com>
>             twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>
>             Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics
>             Director, openEHR Foundation
>             Director, HANDIHealth CIC
>             Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>
>             On 12 March 2015 at 11:50, Birger Haarbrandt
>             <birger.haarbrandt at plri.de
>             <mailto:birger.haarbrandt at plri.de>> wrote:
>
>                 Hi there,
>
>                 I'm a little confused about the
>                 "openEHR-EHR-OBSERVATION.braden_scale-child.v1" aka
>                 "Modified Braden Q Scale" at the openEHR CKM. I would
>                 have expected some explanations in the header what has
>                 been modified in comparison to the non-modified Braden
>                 Q Scale. In fact, it looks mostly like the common
>                 Braden Scale expect from an upper boundary on the
>                 "Braden Total Score" of 20 instead of 23. As the
>                 elements are the same as in the Braden Scale
>                 Archetype, I would expect the upper bound to be at 23,
>                 too...this just doesn't seem right.
>
>                 At the same time, I expected the "Modified Braden Q
>                 Scale" to have the "tissue perfusion" element.
>
>                 Any help is greatly appreciated :)
>
>                 -- 
>                 *Birger Haarbrandt, M.Sc.*
>
>                 Peter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik
>                 Technische Universität Braunschweig und
>                 Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
>                 Mühlenpfordtstraße 23
>                 D-38106 Braunschweig
>
>                 T +49 (0)531 391-2129 <tel:%2B49%20%280%29531%20391-2129>
>                 F +49 (0)531 391-9502 <tel:%2B49%20%280%29531%20391-9502>
>                 birger.haarbrandt at plri.de
>                 <mailto:birger.haarbrandt at plri.de>
>                 http://www.plri.de
>
>
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 openEHR-clinical mailing list
>                 openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>                 <mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
>                 http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             openEHR-clinical mailing list
>             openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org  <mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
>             http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>
>         -- 
>         *Birger Haarbrandt, M.Sc.*
>
>         Peter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik
>         Technische Universität Braunschweig und
>         Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
>         Mühlenpfordtstraße 23
>         D-38106 Braunschweig
>
>         T +49 (0)531 391-2129 <tel:%2B49%20%280%29531%20391-2129>
>         F +49 (0)531 391-9502 <tel:%2B49%20%280%29531%20391-9502>
>         birger.haarbrandt at plri.de <mailto:birger.haarbrandt at plri.de>
>         http://www.plri.de
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         openEHR-clinical mailing list
>         openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>         <mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
>         http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     openEHR-clinical mailing list
>     openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>     <mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
>     http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org


-- 
*Birger Haarbrandt, M.Sc.*

Peter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik
Technische Universität Braunschweig und
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Mühlenpfordtstraße 23
D-38106 Braunschweig

T +49 (0)531 391-2129
F +49 (0)531 391-9502
birger.haarbrandt at plri.de
http://www.plri.de

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20150316/6d0819fb/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list