Procedure archetype for operative notes

Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de
Tue Feb 16 03:45:20 EST 2016


Hi everyone,

Anca, I agree with you. I think it would be better to have an own procedure action archetype for anesthesia. There are some more of these actions which can be done during a surgery, e.g. X-Ray/imaging help, blood arrest, pre-operative examination – I think it is not valid to model these concepts as CLUSTER because these are own ACTIONS, right? Unfortunately, it is not possible to add these ‘special methods’-archetypes into the details-slot of the surgery procedure archetype then (e.g. within a template) – so you can’t really represent that these actions may be a part of the surgery action.
How would be the approach to represent something like sub-actions?


Antje Wulff

Peter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik
Technische Universität Braunschweig und
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
Mühlenpfordtstraße 23
D-38106 Braunschweig

Anca Heyd


Hi everybody.

I get involved a little late in this discussion, sorry for this but I did not know obout this forum.

The point is, we have already worked a lot on surgery and how to model the whole process.

We have implemented planning of surgery already and we did it by modelling a template for decision for surgery.

Like you we used the procedure INSTRUCTION archetype and it seems to work well. There is only one difference.

We decided to have one procedure instruction for the surgery an d one for the anesthesia. This because you sometimes you need surgery without anesthesia or anesthesia without surgery and we think that these to are so different that I makes sense to describe them as own procedure.

Than we added a lot of Clusters with details like information about priority details, special needs for surgery, plan for anesthesia etc.

That was the planning.

We are now proceeding to performing and documenting the procedure and we actually also thought of using the action care steps for registration of the different times/states during an operation.

Ian could you tell a little bit more about why do you think this would not be a good idea?



Ha en strålende dag
[cid:image001.png at 01D0624B.BEB55B10]
Anca
Mobil +47 472 63 241

Fra: openEHR-clinical [mailto:openehr-clinical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] På vegne av Ian McNicoll
Sendt: mandag 15. februar 2016 18.07
Til: For openEHR clinical discussions <openehr-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
Emne: Re: Procedure archetype for operative notes

Hi Birger,

Sorry for the delay in responding.

I suspect this is one of the situations where it feels like you have found a consistentpattern i.e. 'surgical times' but where each procedure and speciality may have very different ideas about exactly which times are significant. I had a similar experience when modelling metastatic cancer spread, where there initially seems to be a lot of commonality but you quickly get into a tangle with exceptions and redundant elements.

My inclination would be to create a generic cluster for operative details, including the common 'surgical times' but expect to have to 'fork' this frequently in the way that the physical examination archetypes are now modelled - i.e aim for generic patterns, rathe than true inheritance.

I don't think these sub-events really qualify as Care steps.  The only exception might be pre-op and post-op procedures/summary which perhaps merit their own archetypes but for now I would probably just include these within the operative details CLUSTER archetype.

Ian

Dr Ian McNicoll
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
office +44 (0)1536 414994
skype: ianmcnicoll
email: ian at freshehr.com<mailto:ian at freshehr.com>
twitter: @ianmcnicoll

[Das Bild wurde vom Absender entfernt.]
Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnicoll at openehr.org<mailto:ian.mcnicoll at openehr.org>
Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
Director, HANDIHealth CIC
Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL

On 9 February 2016 at 12:15, <Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de<mailto:Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
Thanks for sharing your ideas on modelling an operative report. I decided to use the procedure archetype in the way Ian described.  Now I am thinking about how to integrate the different surgery steps, e.g. pre-operative preparation of the room/of the patient, incision to closure, post-operative preparation... for each step there is a specific date/time which has to be represented within  an archetype. Do you think it might be possible to use the PATHWAY  within the ACTION archetypes?
The first idea was to create a CLUSTER archetype called 'surgical times' in which each surgery step is represented by one data element (by using the data type date/time) but it does not feel very comfortable to me.
Thanks for your help
Regards,
Antje

Birger Haarbrandt

Hi all,

I think it would be a good idea to have an example template. It might serve as a good starting point and reference model (not to be confused with the openEHR Reference Model :). However, our current effort is to create a template that mimics two surgery management systems at Hannover Medical School for the purpose of data integration. Therefore, the results might need some additional editing to become a good and generic example.

Cheers,

Birger
Jakob Mathiszig-Lee <jakob at mathisziglee.co.uk<mailto:jakob at mathisziglee.co.uk>> hat am 4. Februar 2016 um 14:50 geschrieben:

It's the WHO safe surgery check list: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/safesurgery/checklist/en/
The completed version (printed if electronically) gets filed as part of the operative record in the theaters i've worked in
Ian McNicoll<mailto:ian at freshehr.com>
04 February 2016 13:43
Hi Jakob

Can you point us to the WHO checklists you had in mind ? It is worth noting that checklists are often orthogonal to operational data capture.

I would be thinking in terms of operative note as a composition , using the procedure archetype with device and detailed method in the slot.

To maximise reuse I would probably put specimen inside the relevant lab request archetype and similarly record meds using a medication order archetype. Prepping diagnosis would use the problem-diagnosis archetype.

Is it worth working this up as an exemplar template to put up on CKM?

Ian
_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
Jakob Mathiszig-Lee<mailto:jakob at mathisziglee.co.uk>
04 February 2016 10:47
Speaking as an anaesthetist there's enough going on on an anaesthetic chart to warrant its own archetype imo.

Specimens, sets used and local anaesthetic infiltrated by the surgeon are generally recorded in the op note section of an operative booklet. I suspect specimens don't have to be included if they'd be recorded by virtue of electronic requesting.

One other thing is to work out where the WHO checklists fits in around the op note


On 4 Feb 2016, at 10:28, "Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de<mailto:Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de>" <Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de<mailto:Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de>> wrote:

Hi everyone,



We’re trying to model an operative note document - therefore we used the procedure archetype openEHR-EHR-ACTION.procedure.v1 and specialised it by adding other archetypes into the procedure details slot. Within the description of the procedure archetype it says

'Additional structured and detailed information about the procedure can be captured using purpose-specific archetypes inserted into the 'Procedure detail' slot'

but

'this archetype will be used to record only what was done during the procedure. Separate archetypes will be used to record the other required components of the Operation Report'.

I am a bit confused - we added something like specimens taken, devices, medication during surgery. Do you think it is valid to add these archetypes into the slot procedure details?

And what about elements like preoperative diagnosis, risks and anesthesia? I think these are detailed information for the surgery but they do not belong to the surgery itself - so they shouldn't be added.

What do you think?





Thanks for your help and ideas.





Kind regards

Antje



Antje Wulff



Peter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik

Technische Universität Braunschweig und

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Mühlenpfordtstraße 23

D-38106 Braunschweig


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________

openEHR-clinical mailing list

openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>

http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de<mailto:Wulff.Antje at mh-hannover.de>
04 February 2016 10:26

Hi everyone,



We’re trying to model an operative note document - therefore we used the procedure archetype openEHR-EHR-ACTION.procedure.v1 and specialised it by adding other archetypes into the procedure details slot. Within the description of the procedure archetype it says

'Additional structured and detailed information about the procedure can be captured using purpose-specific archetypes inserted into the 'Procedure detail' slot'

but

'this archetype will be used to record only what was done during the procedure. Separate archetypes will be used to record the other required components of the Operation Report'.

I am a bit confused - we added something like specimens taken, devices, medication during surgery. Do you think it is valid to add these archetypes into the slot procedure details?

And what about elements like preoperative diagnosis, risks and anesthesia? I think these are detailed information for the surgery but they do not belong to the surgery itself - so they shouldn't be added.

What do you think?





Thanks for your help and ideas.





Kind regards

Antje



Antje Wulff



Peter L. Reichertz Institut für Medizinische Informatik

Technische Universität Braunschweig und

Medizinische Hochschule Hannover

Mühlenpfordtstraße 23

D-38106 Braunschweig


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

--
Sent from Postbox<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>


_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

_______________________________________________
openEHR-clinical mailing list
openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org<mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20160216/596eddde/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ~WRD000.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: ~WRD000.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20160216/596eddde/attachment.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/x-citrix-jpeg
Size: 815 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20160216/596eddde/attachment-0001.jpg>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list