HL7 and negation

GF gfrer at luna.nl
Wed Jun 8 02:54:20 EDT 2016



Dear Colleagues,

HL7 is thinking about the problem of negation.
 http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Negation_Requirements <http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Negation_Requirements>
The group discussing it created a document with negation use cases.

My questions are:
- Can you let us know your reaction to this list of use cases?
And
- How should ‘negation’ be handled the best in respect of semantic interpretability?

My personal opinions:
- the boolean should not be used
- try to translate the ‘negation’ problem into ‘presence and absence’. A concept is or is not present, a numeric result is of is not present.
- do not use pre- and post co-ordinated concepts using SNOMED but use the SNOMED primitives.

I’m curious to learn what your opinion is.

Gerard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20160608/dd70d0e4/attachment-0004.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: NegationUseCases.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 56138 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20160608/dd70d0e4/attachment.xlsx>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20160608/dd70d0e4/attachment-0005.html>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list