Normal range/reference ranges for text data type

Karsten Hilbert Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net
Wed Sep 28 09:25:27 EDT 2016


On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 01:23:00PM +0100, Ian McNicoll wrote:

> If a result is expressed as normal/ abnormal or high/normal/low,
> surely the 'normalcy range' is self-defining.
> 
> If there is a need for the lab to assert some kind of textual normalcy
> rangeThe 'reference range guidance' element  in the Lab panel
> archetype is intended for this purpose and essentially equates to
> referenceRange/text in the FHIR Observation.

I think Silje was asking about a way to define reference
ranges for textual results in a computable fashion.

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346




More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list