SNOMED in CKM

Bert Verhees bert.verhees at rosa.nl
Wed Apr 12 05:31:33 EDT 2017


Thanks Ian.  This explains very well what we (in the Netherlands) need 
to do when "running" archetypes in Germany (which is non-member-country)
I think it is also good for others which use CKM, to realize that, if 
appropriate.

Bert


Op 12-4-2017 om 11:22 schreef Ian McNicoll:
> Hi Bert,
>
> This is a good and timely post. We are just finalising an Affiliate 
> License agreement with SNOMED. It has not been formally signed off but 
> the broad approach is that we are allowed to put SNOMED bindings in 
> archetypes as long as it is made clear to users of those archetypes 
> that they must be appropriately SNOMED-licensed if  they want to use 
> those bindings in run-time systems. This is roughly consistent with 
> the approach reached with FHIR.
>
> As far as I am aware none of the current bindings in archetypes force 
> the use of SNOMED at run-time.
>
> So practically, no-one should be concerned about using archetypes with 
> SNOMED bindings, unless they intend to use SNOMED within their 
> systems, in which case they should make sure they are covered by a 
> national or individual licence.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ian
>
> Dr Ian McNicoll
> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
> office +44 (0)1536 414994
> skype: ianmcnicoll
> email: ian at freshehr.com <mailto:ian at freshehr.com>
> twitter: @ianmcnicoll
>
>
> Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnicoll at openehr.org 
> <mailto:ian.mcnicoll at openehr.org>
> Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd.
> Director, HANDIHealth CIC
> Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>
> On 12 April 2017 at 09:56, Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl 
> <mailto:bert.verhees at rosa.nl>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>     I needed to clean up archetypes from SNOMED bindings because of
>     license-reasons, I "grepped" the local directory from CKM.
>     To my surprise I found there SNOMED bindings in over 50 archetypes.
>     This can, I think, be a problem for countries which have no SNOMED
>     license.
>     Or is the opinion that SNOMED is allowed in archetypes even in
>     non-member-countries.
>
>     Bert
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     openEHR-clinical mailing list
>     openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>     <mailto:openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org>
>     http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>     <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org>
>
>
>
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
> 	Virusvrij. www.avg.com 
> <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient> 
>
>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-clinical mailing list
> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20170412/6dee4ef3/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the openEHR-clinical mailing list