Machine Learning , some thoughts
Karsten.Hilbert at gmx.net
Mon Jun 25 09:11:36 EDT 2018
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Philippe Ameline wrote:
> A friend of mine recently published a paper, after studying a group of
> GPs located in the South of France. He found out that the diagnosis is
> not reported in observations in more than one encounter out of two.
That's because it rarely actually matters.
And it is rarely actually specifiable.
There's a four-stage grouping of "diagnostic certainty" in
German GP research lore:
'A': _('A: Sign'),
'B': _('B: Cluster of signs'),
'C': _('C: Syndromic diagnosis'),
'D': _('D: Scientific diagnosis')
Most encounters or even episodes of care don't
reach C, let alone D.
GPG 40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6 5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B
More information about the openEHR-clinical