difference and relationship between openEHR and EN13606
serefarikan at kurumsalteknoloji.com
Fri Aug 28 01:54:34 EDT 2015
Sorry, but I have to ask: are you doing a homework?
On Friday, 28 August 2015, 王海生 <edwin_uestc at 163.com> wrote:
> could we just add a page on openEHR website to illustrate these points
> 在 2015-08-28 01:54:58，"Thomas Beale" <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
> On 26/08/2015 16:46, Erik Sundvall wrote:
> Where can one find proposals/diagrams describing the refreshed RM
> (reference model) in the new 13606 revision? Will 13606 keep using the
> old data types or harmonize more with CIMI or OpenEHR?
> Is there now consensus/majority regarding using ADL/AOM 2.0 for 13606? If
> so, great!
> When it comes to "simplifying" the RM (or perhaps moving complexity to
> another meta/design-pattern layer) I think CIMI has gone further than
> 13606. Are there any plans of aligning 13606 with CIMI?
> I would suggest that CIMI has been simiplified to the point of not being
> directly usable as an RM by openEHR or 13606 - most of the needed context
> information is gone in CIMI, and it doesn't distinguish any kind of 'Entry'
> or clinical statement.
> This was a conscious choice in the CIMI community, designed to get buy-in
> from a much wider range of stakeholders than openEHR or 13606 deals with.
> Technically, the CIMI approach is to soft-model nearly everything in
> 'reference archetypes'.
> - thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openEHR-technical