Archetype versioning: Skipping v1 and going straight to v2?

Thomas Beale thomas.beale at
Fri Aug 28 13:05:07 EDT 2015

Hi Silje,

I would not expect any problems.

- thomas

On 28/08/2015 23:05, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> We’ve bumped into an issue related to versioning of archetypes and 
> implementing non-published versions:
> Several implementation projects are using archetypes from the 
> CKM, many of which are still drafts or under 
> review since the CKM switch to v0 for unpublished archetypes was done 
> only recently, and the publicly available tools all use v1 by default, 
> lots of functionality has already been made using unpublished v1 
> versions of archetypes, and will be deployed this autumn. Of course, 
> when reviewed, these archetypes may go through drastic changes, and 
> this will be a problem once other projects at a later time try to use 
> archetypes which by then may have been published as v1.
> One of our proposed solutions is to skip v1 for these archetypes and 
> go straight to v2 when publishing them. Is this practically possible, 
> and will it have any adverse consequences?
> Kind regards,
> *Silje Ljosland Bakke*
> **
> Information Architect, RN
> Coordinator, National Editorial Board for Archetypes
> National ICT Norway

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the openEHR-technical mailing list