AW: Seeking clarification regarding Assumed value
thomas.beale at openehr.org
Tue Oct 9 09:47:28 EDT 2018
It is still in ADL2, but harmless, so I would leave it in the specs and
advise tool developers to ignore it, if that is the consensus.
On 09/10/2018 06:29, Sebastian Garde wrote:
> Assumed value was a slick idea at the time, but I do agree with your
> sentiments now:
> * it is hardly or not at all processable,
> * where there is widespread consensus on something it may well be
> assumed automatically by clinicians – but this is not because
> someone put the assumed value in the archetype or not.
> * Elements where such consensus exists across professions/sectors
> are probably rare anyway and universal consensus on an assumption
> is hard to ascertain
> * challenges for UI
> * challenges for querying (assuming you even dare)
> * challenges for anybody to understand it, including the difference
> to a default value (and what happens if there is both).
> Not sure about the implications for dropping/deprecating this at this
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openEHR-technical