AW: Seeking clarification regarding Assumed value

Thomas Beale thomas.beale at openehr.org
Tue Oct 9 09:47:28 EDT 2018


It is still in ADL2, but harmless, so I would leave it in the specs and 
advise tool developers to ignore it, if that is the consensus.

- t


On 09/10/2018 06:29, Sebastian Garde wrote:
>
> Assumed value was a slick idea at the time, but I do agree with your 
> sentiments now:
>
>   * it is hardly or not at all processable,
>   * where there is widespread consensus on something it may well be
>     assumed automatically by clinicians – but this is not because
>     someone put the assumed value in the archetype or not.
>   * Elements where such consensus exists across professions/sectors
>     are probably rare anyway and universal consensus on an assumption
>     is hard to ascertain
>   * challenges for UI
>   * challenges for querying (assuming you even dare)
>   * challenges for anybody to understand it, including the difference
>     to a default value (and what happens if there is both).
>
> Not sure about the implications for dropping/deprecating this at this 
> stage
>
> Sebastian
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20181009/4783e0e5/attachment.html>


More information about the openEHR-technical mailing list